![]() Looking to the fan sites for a clue, I found that it was significantly more than just a few users who were affected. It seems that having the article protected was their intention. However, he/she wrote in their comment "lock this article so everyone will know". Vandelay 04:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Īll true. Disney) to get some resolution to this issue, not Wikipedia. Please work through proper channels (i.e. Vandalizing the article is NOT a battle that you can win. I, for one, would have been happy to accomodate discussion of this issue in the "Criticisms" section of the article, and I'd still be willing to do so. But vandalizing this page is not the solution. I also understand that many of these accusations very well could be incorrect. I understand what's at the root of this: the recent 3-day lockout of several users due to Disney's accusasations of macro activity. I see that the topic was locked today due to repeated vandalism. Mr.Rachel 20:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Recent vandalism Vandelay 18:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Reply (No I don't work for Disney, but I know about this enhancement because I had specfically requested it).īack on topic, I agree that we shouldn't list fansites in the article. If a parent wants to limit their child's Secret Friends, all they need to do is keep the child from knowing the Parent Password. #TOONTOWN INFINITE KEY PASSWORD#Back in December 2004, they added the "Restricted Secret Friends" setting to the parental controls - it requires the Parent Password to be entered every time a secret is generated or entered. Well, since we're on the subject, Disney DID do something about the secret codes being passed on fansites. Huanghe63 talk 00:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Reply The same thing happens with Toontown Secret Friends, but it isn't really patrolled, due to the fact that secret friends usually only happen between two people, and that no other suscribers other than another friend can read it. Doesn't use secret codes, but enforces not being able to give out secret information. Besides, wouldn't Disney do something about those people that offer up the secret codes to talk to people? Take VMK for an example. Even if it says something like "Not related to Disney whatsoever" that isn't a copywrite infringement. Ryanbomber 13:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Reply The problem is that fansites are also equal, and Wikipedia only wants us to list the most significant fansite, so I guess we won't be able to list any of them, unless we want to come to a consensus as to which is the most significant. Also, it is not powered by Disney but it does not violate copywrite - if they did, the sites would have been shut down by now. Sonic34 13:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Sonic34 Reply įansites are significant - they contain information. We should deleated these due to copyright. On the bottem Of it says it is not powerd by Disney. I think that these should be deleated beacuase they have no connection with Disney and is copyright. That is agenist the toontown Secret Friends rules and must be premently deleated. #TOONTOWN INFINITE KEY FULL#Would you agree? SleepyheadKC 19:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC) Reply Īll fansites sould be deleated ASAP these are dangrous and are full of Online Predotrs they are for toons to go into chat rooms and make secret friends with pepole around the world. I don't see Wikipedia as being the place for a detailed players' guide or strategy guide. My assumption is that Wikipedia should serve as a very good general description of Toontown along with what makes it unique and interesting. I'm a longtime toon of 2.5 years, and I enjoyed working on this. (Sorry about the huge number of minor edits - I'm a relentless editor of my own writing). Most of the revisions in late January 2006 were by me, known as Big Tom Supernugget on the TTC site. This is Fuzzy Bunny Bop, Management, Hi Fuzzy! And i was the one saying no links to IF sites. Thanks for the endorsement Weird Flapjack. ![]() #TOONTOWN INFINITE KEY UPDATE#Z.Spy 01:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC) Reply Īnd will someone(other than me)PLEASE update the page? ![]() SleepyheadKC 19:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) Reply No fansites at all. ![]() That being the case, I think it's best to eliminate all fansites from this topic. Toontown has so many fansites now, I don't think there's one "major" site, with the possible exception of Toontown Central. According to the Wikipedia External_links topic, "On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite is appropriate, marking the link as such". People are repeatedly adding links to external fansites to this topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |